See the Zero Margin, Zero Risk Forex trading Expert Advisor in action. Find it here

24 comentários em “See the Zero Margin, Zero Risk Forex trading Expert Advisor in action. Find it here”

1. For more information please use these links: #expert4x #expert4xforex #expert4xforextrading

2. I want to do forex trade with 0 leverage and 0 Margin. Is that possible?

3. can you show us a real account ? 🙂 backtest alwways backtest …

4. Great guy! great Trader !

5. The only way to actually win $$$ here is by multiplying gains or cutting losses. Sooner or later you must enter into a risk situation and have a margin. Even should the market fluctuate and thus old negative positions become profitable. You always have the countering minus. Without some risk…some margin needed. Only person getting rich is your broker. Eventually your account will get chewed up by broker fees. The opportunities however to blend this with some other strategies to get some crazy profits is pretty cool though. It does raise food for thought.

6. Very fascinate. Thanks !

7. If this can be applied to Nadex binary options in particular the dow jones we might have something.

8. It does not look like this technique will work in the US because of the FIFO rules.

9. A word of warning with regard to these high volume trading EAs such as this one, is the commission charged by your broker means any profits made could be wiped out. Smaller grid sizes mean a small profit after spread and commission. If the EA has overtraded in an attempt to make the target set, you may end up losing money on a "profitable" trade.

   Alex feel free to refute my comments by pointing me towards a broker more friendly to high volume EAs, as I have yet to find one and is the reason I have never traded live with my GTM after several years of ownership.

10. So essentially if you trade with zero margin and zero risk by hedging, you make the broker rich, but you won't get rich. If you go with the Grid Trend Multiplier, it will work, but only in a ranging market (not trending markets) and only if you get the direction right, in which case you aren't at zero margin or zero risk trading like video's title and your previous video's title both suggested, correct?

11. Excellent video. Always good to watch your material

12. If the last video was a test, clearly I flunked.

13. Yep, same conclusion I reached. But a very valid conclusion nonetheless! Great video, Alex, to show that you must take a risk to get a reward.

14. The important figure in the black box is P&L USD. In every single instance it was negative at the end of the test. In the last one for instance although the balance figure was $10422.87 and the equity was $10160.13, the P&L USD was minus $262.73. So how was that a profit overall? You can't win in forex because the spreads put you at a huge disadvantage. I don't believe there is any system that will consistently beat the forex markets if you trade them in an exchange. The average volatility is too low to beat those spreads. Now if there was some kind of zero fee peer to peer currency exchange then it could be beat, but there is none. However, there are zero fee crypto exchanges, like Liquid, formerly Quoine. If you used that bot in the Liquid BTC/USD market you could theoretically come out ahead. There is a price spread but it's actually in your favor instead of against you like in forex, unless you make market orders. If you always made limit orders the spread would be in your favor. Right now you could put a buy order in for $3889 and change and at the same time you could put a sell order in at $3890 and change. It shows you the spread in the order book readout and it's usually somewhere between 1 and 2 dollars. You can market make and profit from the spread, you can't do that in forex, you're always compelled to buy at the high end of the spread and sell at the low end of it, the exchange itself is the market maker and no trader is allowed to be.

    That's why forex is for suckers and why crypto is the only market that is actually worth risking capital in. The traders themselves are the market makers. The exchanges actually want you to market make to provide liquidity. In forex only the banks can provide liquidity and be market makers. You're on the wrong end of that arrangement all the time no matter what. There's a crypto exchange called HitBTC that actually pays people to be market makers to provide the exchange liquidity but the contract makes you maintain very tight spreads. It's a bad deal though from what I hear so just do it on your own as a trader and get the full profit instead of just a cut of the profit if you contract yourself to them as a liquidity provider. That exchange has no trading fees on limit orders but they do on market orders, so just don't make market orders. Bottom line, as any bookie knows, nobody can beat a spread long term, or extremely few.

15. Alex, what happens if you’re using the multiplier in two negatively correlated pairs? Do they cancel each other out, or do you end up with profits (as the winning pair has more opened trades than the losing one)?

16. This is gambling 101, at least with that high of lot sizing (I know it's an example), sorry to say… I see this working in calm markets though… but as soon as there's a trend you are going to suffer… the bigger the spread between the higher order and the lower of the bunch the worse the situation become, so sideways price movement is the best condition to operate this, volatility kills you here (only option to not suffer a heart attack, hahaa)

17. This is an account zero system. When you close all the positions, your final balance will be always less than the initial balance. Here profit of one trade is nullify by the loss of its counter trade. But as the number of trades increases, loss due to spread also increases. So if the system runs for long time, your balance will be zero ultimately.

18. What will happened to all losses acumalating.. once you close all trades you will end up in negative balance..

19. Some very good concepts there Alex, brilliantly educational.

20. Hi ,i want to ask you this robot or system which you have in this video it cost 280 $?thank you

21. ABSOLUTELY STUNNING

22. just question at exactly 25:47 ..it makes 9020$ total net profit…so we dont look at the slow process of test because the equity was LOSING…we look at the end of the test it was WIN…that means we should RUN the EA more than 5-6 weeks to reach win as we cant cut it off in the middle of this weeks or we will get loses as equity show…..??? is that right or i am misunderstanding …i hope u answer me Sir Alex cause i am interested

23. Thank u sir…

24. Great video and EA. I would like to see how you manage the GTM EA on a buy and sell setting long term and short term. I have seen that I can change the setting even while the EA is currently on.

Os comentários estão fechados.